So... much... knowledge... NOT. You want US-owned TLDs? Knock yourself out. US isn't the world nor is the Internet theirs. Got it?
And where the fu... fudge is alternative TLDs "corner of the internet"? LOL On May 13, 12:36 am, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > You mean one that's been distributing modded drivers for longer than > the Intel 945's been out, that has legitimacy through both nVidia and > ATi? One that's had actual legal action happen before, dealt with it, > and continued distribution? If nothing else, I'm thinking reaching out > there could be a good idea in general. Hiding off in the corner of the > internet, advertised only by the occasional non-scammy Youtube video > and the Minecraft forums isn't the way to go. > > On May 12, 6:47 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You mean a .net TLD that can be taken down by a snap of fingers? > > Yeah... no thanks. > > > Actually things are a bit more complicated than that. I believe that > > while Blizzard is big, they have nothing on a monopolist corp like > > Intel. > > > Planning for the future means no US-owned TLDs. It's that simple. We > > could go direct IP route, but it has to be user friendly, so going out > > of copyright a-holes reach is the only way to do it. > > > On May 12, 11:43 pm, arcane cossack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Why don't we see if OmegaDrivers will host drivers for us? > > > > On May 11, 10:22 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Honestly, I think we should REALLY steer away from US owned TLDs. > > > > Things are too problematic as it is for us to be an easy target by > > > > using a .net, .org, .com, or any of those. > > > > > Designing a website requires design skills which I don't have, at > > > > least like I should :( > > > > > And Espio, who knows if you can pull of something like Portal... ;) > > > > > On May 12, 3:06 am, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Webhost is on his way soon, it'll be hosting website/forums, like a > > > > > proper damn site! > > > > > If anyone ( we'll start with the managers first, then members ;) ) > > > > > wants to design the website, give me a shout. I'll be putting > > > > > everything up that has to do with forums. > > > > > > Adress will most likely be 9xxssf.net , I feel that with this domain > > > > > alone, we can begin doing things way bigger than here, and expanding > > > > > to more things. > > > > > > Who knows, maybe in the future, 9xxssf will be hosting gaming > > > > > servers?! :P > > > > > > On May 11, 9:45 pm, Tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yeah, they each did one, and 9xxssf.info was actually shaping up, > > > > > > but > > > > > > it got taken down for unknown reasons. > > > > > > > And yes, we should have an avatar, various sized banners for forums, > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > I've seen both 9xxssf and 9xxSSF, and I honestly prefer with capital > > > > > > letters. > > > > > > > I've only known about the custom d3d9.dll, not a tool that makes > > > > > > them, > > > > > > but that sounds interesting. > > > > > > > And what's that about you making a 2006 Source based (the good > > > > > > one ;) ) game? > > > > > > > On May 12, 2:41 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think I recall DanielPK and Rick van Veen having a website too, > > > > > > > although > > > > > > > I'm not sure on this. > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:33 PM, arcane cossack > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >http://9xxssf.net63.net/forum/ThisistheonlyforumIsaw, and I've > > > > > > > > talked to NeoDragon a little on it about development. > > > > > > > > Otherwise, I > > > > > > > > haven't seen any activity there. > > > > > > > > > On May 11, 8:35 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 1. I redid the Xfire group, the old one had references to our > > > > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > group name (Intel 9xx) and I thought 9xxssf was better :) > > > > > > > > > (the old > > > > > > > > > group still exists because Xfire's policy doesn't allow > > > > > > > > > deletion of > > > > > > > > > clans, however, making new ones is acceptable) > > > > > > > > > > 2. "9xx Soldiers sans frontiers", when I put that as the Clan > > > > > > > > > name for > > > > > > > > > the Xfire group, well, does the S and F in "sans frontiers" > > > > > > > > > have to be > > > > > > > > > lowercase? I'm usually a bit picky when it comes to stuff > > > > > > > > > like that > > > > > > > > > lol > > > > > > > > > > 3. Did we have an official avatar-sized picture for the > > > > > > > > > group? I can't > > > > > > > > > recall if we had one uploaded or not. The one on the site > > > > > > > > > here is the > > > > > > > > > old Intel 9xx one. > > > > > > > > > > 4.Whats the news on the official website? Last I heard, I > > > > > > > > > think there > > > > > > > > > was 2 or 3 people who had seperate sites up for backing up > > > > > > > > > material, > > > > > > > > > and that MAD_BEAST was contacting someone for the forums. > > > > > > > > > > 5. I think I might try to create a game using Source SDK. > > > > > > > > > It'll be a > > > > > > > > > multiplayer FPS, and it will also be on the Source 2006 engine > > > > > > > > > (because Source 2007+ have that weird lighting issue). Not > > > > > > > > > sure how > > > > > > > > > well it will go exactly because I have very limited knowledge > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > Source SDK. > > > > > > > > > > 6. Has anyone ever heard of the D3D9Gen tool for Fallout NV? > > > > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > > apparently generates a custom d3d9.dll for your graphics > > > > > > > > > card, however > > > > > > > > > I don't know exactly how or what it does (but it apparently > > > > > > > > > fixes FPS > > > > > > > > > issues in FNV, and RIFT). > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
