From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+mitch.curtis=theqtcompany....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of NoMercy Sent: Tuesday, 5 April 2016 3:04 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?
I see the answers usually offering some workarounds, yes you can do that BUT in a few more steps or in a less pleasent way. Thats where IU/UX design comes in. People don't want extra steps, people don't want to use mouse etc. So, file bug reports. I observe that most of you guys objecting are don't even see what others are doing or don't even care beyond whats good for your use cases and you get angry when I or other people say things like eons behind while you don't even look what others doing or what are current trends or dont care for UI/UX of your IDE, You don't even now other good IDEs. New features are constantly being added to Creator, and they’re often from suggestions from users who see something in another IDE that is missing in Creator. The way to get a feature in is to suggest it (formally, via Jira) or write it yourself. The way to not get a feature in is to propose that Creator be rewritten and “replaced by CLion”. For the record, I’m not angry, I just find the way you’ve approached the whole situation amusing. So because I don’t know of JetBrains’ IDE, I don’t know of any other good IDEs? Ok, if you say so! :) Regards, Emre Besirik
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
