> On 05 Apr 2016, at 17:08, Guenter Schwann <gun...@schwann.at> wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 05, 2016 04:19:42 PM NoMercy wrote: >> That QtCreator is eons behind current technology and trends, isn't it very >> obvious? > > No! Absolutely not. > QtCreator is a really great IDE. Very lightweight, but still very powerful. > Simply using the "Esc" button is a single fantastic feature that I haven't > seen elsewhere. > > And for the technology: CLion as well as QtCreator are using clang for the > code model (which is the heart of an IDE). > What other technology do you mean? > > What trends do you see for IDEs? > >> I would say just checkout features of ANY JetBrains product but >> you don't even intend to so you are in therefor denial. (Not personally you >> but many people who are objecting these) > > I haven't used it yet - granted. But I have watched all the CLion releases so > far. > They are looking promising. But I haven't seen any major feature that > QtCreator would lack (C++ only).
Some of the lacking features are smart autocomplete maybe, Ctrl+K like search but improved in a better UI, but most lacking part comes in UI/UX Regards, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
