> 4) It's just brain-dead to suggest using a non-Qt ide for Qt. Qt is the
> perfect framework for writing an IDE, irrespective of the language
> you're aiming for :) JetBrains stuff is only performant in the expense
> of a huge memory footprint and relatively longer startup time. This is
> of course fine in the age of multi-gigabyte-memory SSD-backed developer
> workstations, but don't claim that using Java is NOT a trade-off.
I agree here Java is not perfect, it has downsides but after initial startup it
definetely pays of
> 5) Saying "Hey I'm not trying to be hard on [some people] but they suck"
> is not less insulting than a straight-up "You suck". I wouldn't expect
> the community to fall for this. Come on guys, don't feed the troll :)
No I really do NOT mean to insulting anyone, most likely the problem is that
the team behind QtCreator is just no UI/UX expert, that doesn’t mean they are
bad at their job! this is no trolling...
Keep encoureging previous generation stuff as good and denying improvements is
no good to anyone.
Regards,
Emre Besirik
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
