> From what I see, IPTV industry is massively switching away from Qt because
> LGPL3 is incompatible with clients’ requirements
I’m just from IBC (http://www.ibc.org) and I didn’t see much “switching away
from Qt” there. What I saw was switching from LGPL v2.1 to commercial license.
> On 17 сент. 2016 г., at 22:59, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 17.09.2016, 23:21, "Sérgio Martins" <iamser...@gmail.com>:
>> It's not unusual for us developers and contributors to lose
>> perspective of what's important.
>> After many years spent on very particular implementation details, it
>> becomes difficult to see outside of the box.
>> And because we already know the good aspects I'm asking only about the bad.
>> No need to discuss or reach an agreement, just go ahead and enumerate
>> what you don't like.
>> Personally, I don't know (too much time inside the box), but after
>> googling these came up frequently:
>> - C++ is difficult, Qt lacks quality bindings for mainstream languages
>> - moc (on build systems that don't automate this step)
>> - FUD around licensing
> FUD you say? From what I see, IPTV industry is massively switching away from
> Qt because LGPL3 is incompatible with clients' requirements.
>> Please state your top ones, even if it was already stated by someone
>> else, so we have an idea about which ones matter more.
>> Sérgio Martins
>> Interest mailing list
> Interest mailing list
Interest mailing list