> From what I see, IPTV industry is massively switching away from Qt because > LGPL3 is incompatible with clients’ requirements
I’m just from IBC (http://www.ibc.org) and I didn’t see much “switching away from Qt” there. What I saw was switching from LGPL v2.1 to commercial license. --- Artem Sidyakin > On 17 сент. 2016 г., at 22:59, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > > 17.09.2016, 23:21, "Sérgio Martins" <iamser...@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> It's not unusual for us developers and contributors to lose >> perspective of what's important. >> After many years spent on very particular implementation details, it >> becomes difficult to see outside of the box. >> >> And because we already know the good aspects I'm asking only about the bad. >> No need to discuss or reach an agreement, just go ahead and enumerate >> what you don't like. >> >> Personally, I don't know (too much time inside the box), but after >> googling these came up frequently: >> >> - C++ is difficult, Qt lacks quality bindings for mainstream languages >> - moc (on build systems that don't automate this step) >> - FUD around licensing > > FUD you say? From what I see, IPTV industry is massively switching away from > Qt because LGPL3 is incompatible with clients' requirements. > >> >> Please state your top ones, even if it was already stated by someone >> else, so we have an idea about which ones matter more. >> >> Regards, >> Sérgio Martins >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest