Interessant. In Occ hay un regul que grec paroles finient in -se deveni -t, ex quel on deriva (plu o minu...) regularimen li parol galactic ex galaxe (e pro to on scri galaxe e ne galaxie), nam x es ks e talmen xe es kse, poy kt.
It es teoricmen possibil si on imagina un celat form 'anestes-e' quel deveni ambi anestes-ie e aneste-t-ic, ma esque to es necessi? On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:02 PM Marcos Cruz <[email protected]> wrote: > Ex li dictionarium de Kemp e Pope: > ____ > > ANAESTHESIA#n.#anestesie# > ANAESTHETIC#adj.#anestetic (-a)# > ANAESTHETIC#n.#anestetico# > ____ > > Pro quo du rádicas «anestes-» e «anestet-»? It sembla un ínrasonat copie > del anglesi, o un tipperra? Adplu hay null «anestet-» in Cosmoglotta. > > Adplu, semblantment li citat derivate «anestetica» es li sciencie, e > «anestetico» es li executor, ma in anglesi li drogue es «anaesthetic» e > li executor es «anaesthetist» o «anaeshesiologist». > > Vi li usationes in Cosmoglotta, plus altri regular derivates: > > anestesie = statu (Cosmoglotta A 110, 1936) > anestesiar = action (Cosmoglotta A 110, 1936) > anestesiante = drogue (Cosmoglotta B 75, 1945) > anestesiator = executor > anestesist = executor > anestesic = adjective (Cosmoglotta A 110, 1936) > anestesica = sciencie > anestesico = drogue (Cosmoglotta A 138, 1948) > anestesico = executor > > It sembla que «anestet-» es un erra del autores o del tippatores. > > -- > Marcos Cruz > http://alinome.net > > > -- > ne.alinome.net > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#400): https://groups.io/g/interlingue/message/400 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/83076553/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/interlingue/leave/5161842/21656/2010256328/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
