I second that...I like the traditional way -----Original Message----- From: InterMapper-Talk@list.dartware.com <InterMapper-Talk@list.dartware.com> To: InterMapper Discussion <InterMapper-Talk@list.dartware.com> Sent: Wed May 24 12:29:13 2006 Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder
Let me support Hans on this... In the traditional interface if you double click a device it opens the 'device info' window. From here you can set the device address, the probe, the community string, the timeout, the device comment, and the behaviour, and see the SNMP sysdesc all in one handy ergonomic place, and without having to go into map edit mode. With new interface, double clicking a device has no effect. You have to go into map edit mode, select the device. Then you have to do Network/Set Info/xxx six different times to do what was so easy to do with the traditional interface. Then you have to go out of map edit mode. Many more steps involved. The traditional interface is more efficient for this very commonly performed action. At 5:04 PM +0200 5/24/06, Hans Heger wrote: >Tex, > >It is not only the speed but more important the human interface . Example >to change settings of a device I must take more steps. >I have mentioned that already in November > >If you want I will send you a more complete report. > > >regards Hans > >----- Forwarded by Hans Heger/RIVM/NL on 24-05-2006 16:53 ----- > > Hans > Heger/RIVM/NL > To > 21-11-2005 13:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc > > Subject > RE: [Dartware #41707] snmp reading > problemen snmp-cisco(2v2) probe > (Document link: Hans Heger) > > > > > > > > > >I don't know what the basis is of the decision to fade out traditional > >Server versus traditional > >I find both versions indispensable for the following reasons: > >I develop a map's on traditional using my desk and monitoring / and >testing en developing. > >Traditional give more speed and the better user interface using traditional >is very important, it really speeds up testing en developing maps. > >I am planning to use server is more fore common use en monitoring campus >wide on a longer time base. Now I use a MacOS9 9. Imac 4.2.4 for the job. > >With regards Hans Heger RIVM >Server versus traditional > >I find both versions indispensable for the following reasons: > >I develop a map's on traditional using my desk and monitoring / and >testing en developing. > >Traditional give more speed and the better user interface using traditional >is very important, it really speeds up testing en developing maps. > >I am planning to use server is more fore common use en monitoring campus >wide on a longer time base. Now I use a MacOS9 9. Imac 4.2.4 for the job. > >With regards Hans Heger RIVM > > >|--------------------------------------> >| Tex Clayton | >| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | >| Sent by: | >| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| >| tware.com> | >| | >| | >| 24-05-2006 16:36 | >| | >| | >| Please respond to | >| "InterMapper Discussion" | >| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| >| tware.com> | >| | >|--------------------------------------> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | >| > | >| > | >To| > | "InterMapper Discussion" ><InterMapper-Talk@list.dartware.com> > >| > | >cc| > | >| > | >Subject| > | Re: [IM-Talk] InterMapper Feature Survey Reminder >| > | >| > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > > >On May 24, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Hans Heger wrote: > >> I have contacted other users and I am not standing alone in de idea >> that >> the new interface is a step backwards. It works more slowly >> because the >> users have to take more steps to change something. > >Please give us detailed feedback describing what you find frustrating/ >slow, as well as the hardware, OS version, and Java version that the >client is running on. > >-Tex Clayton >Dartware, LLC >http://www.dartware.com > >____________________________________________________________________ >List archives: >http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ >To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >??r?z?m???? >&j)Z??b??(??????j?^????%??]j?pj???o??? ?&???zf?????1?iz??J ~X?????y?& ____________________________________________________________________ List archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/ To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .+-j�!�����i��0�f���܆+�r���{^�f����jY8�X��֫��y�&�:.�˛���m� �צj)m���z����M�d�����]j�pj���
