How well does this scale if you're watching 1,000's - or 10's of
thousands - of servers, each of which might require a significant
nesting? Seems like the map management metaphor would be
overwhelmed, but are you (or anyone) using nesting to manage a large
number of devices (e.g. servers)?
Thanks
-Matt
On May 19, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Randy Millsop wrote:
Nested maps, using the Map Status probe, are working cleanly for
us. I don't know that we'd use this requested feature in lieu of
the Map Status approach.
Thanks,
Randy Millsop
Network Administrator
----- Original Message -----
From: "CunningPike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "InterMapper Discussion" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:33:58 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [IM-Talk] Multi-probes for same device under one icon
Am I the only person using nested maps for this?
CP
Brian Megel wrote:
Rich,
Here are my thoughts for what they are worth.
1) Yes. It would help us manage our maps much easier.
2) I can see an SNMP probe for a server while an HTTP probe for a web
site on that server
3) I can also see a server running Vmware (or other virtual service)
where you would need to ping different IP's on the same probe.
4) Separate would be nice but not a requirement as far as I am
concerned.
5) Most definitely each probe should have its own notifier.
Brian
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________________
List archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/intermapper-talk%40list.dartware.com/
To unsubscribe: send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
