On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>At 12:01 AM 2/18/2004 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote: >> >That's fine. I thought you meant to make register_list_destructors() call >> >register_list_destructors_ex(). >> >> It seems that nuking is out of question and not very good idea after >> all. ;) >> Using zend_register_list_destructors() (or the macro, >> register_list_destructors), >> might be valid in some cases and the real bug is only in the >> zend_fetch_list_dtor_id() >> function which really should ignore the 'unnamed resources'. >> >> See ext/soap for more.. > >I don't quite understand. Why can't the SOAP module give type_names for >these resources? e.g. "sdl", "url", "service". >What am I missing?
Those resources are not used anywhere outside the extension.. so why should they be named? (AFAICS, they're never returned anywhere to user)
That doesn't matter IMO. I think it's OK if we require people to give a name to their resources. It will also make it easier to debug their extensions.
And using the zend_register_list_destructors() you can avoid unnecessary casting from zend_rsrc_list_entry to the desired type. (I'm of course guessing here :)
Yeah but you also get TSRMLS_CC :)
Andi
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
