> Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the > RFC process will be granted in the future.
Yes, I agree. I would love to join that team, which is going to prepare this RFC. Plus, I have shared some of the ideas in the previous message. Best Hamza On 7/19/21, Andreas Heigl <andr...@heigl.org> wrote: > Hey All > > Am 19.07.21 um 16:34 schrieb Levi Morrison via internals: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:38 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:48 PM Tobias Nyholm <tobias.nyh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey. >>>> I would like to get karma to be able to vote on RFCs. I understand that >>>> voting karma isn’t usually given out to people who write their first >>>> mailing list entry. >>>> >>>> But I do believe I qualify as “Lead developers of PHP based projects >>>> (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)” >>> >>> Hey Tobias, >>> >>> My response here is basically the same as the last time the topic came >>> up: >>> https://externals.io/message/110936#110937 Voting is just the very last >>> step of the RFC process, at which point the proposal can no longer be >>> influenced. If you have feedback about a proposal based on your >>> extensive >>> experience in PHP's open source ecosystem, then the discussion phase is >>> the >>> time to provide it, while it can still influence the proposal, as well >>> as >>> other people's view of the proposal. >> >> I second this. >> >>> At least in my personal opinion, I think it's important that people >>> granted >>> voting rights as community representatives have at least some historical >>> involvement in RFC discussions. >> >> I agree with this, but have no specific objection to granting Tobias >> voting karma, as this is underspecified; how long should they >> participate? What kinds of involvement are appropriate? Being >> underspecified is not really their fault, and I don't feel like it >> would be an abuse to grant them voting karma, but do think it would be >> an abuse to deny them voting karma indefinitely because "we" don't get >> around to specifying it. It should be less of a decision on a >> case-by-case basis and more of a checklist. >> > > Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the > RFC process will be granted in the future. > > Looking forward to your inputs. > > Cheers > > Andreas > -- > ,,, > (o o) > +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ > | Andreas Heigl | > | mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" | > | https://andreas.heigl.org | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas | > +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
