> Le 8 mai 2023 à 23:38, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> a écrit :
>
> Ilija Tovilo and I would like to offer another RFC for your consideration.
> It's been a while in coming, and we've evolved the design quite a bit just in
> the last week so if you saw an earlier draft of it in the past few months, I
> would encourage you to read it over again to make sure we're all on the same
> page. I'm actually pretty happy with where it ended up, even if it's not the
> original design. This approach eliminates several hard-to-implement edge
> cases while still providing a lot of functionality in one package.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property-hooks
>
Hi,
If I understand correctly, given:
<?php
class C {
public int $someInt;
public float $someFloat;
public int $someIntWithHook {
get => $field;
set => $field = $value;
}
public float $someFloatWithHook {
get => $field;
set => $field = $value;
}
}
?>
we have:
<?php
$obj = new C;
var_dump($obj->someInt = 42.0); // int(42)
var_dump($obj->someFloat = 42); // float(42)
?>
but:
<?php
$obj = new C;
var_dump($obj->someIntWithHook = 42.0); // float(42)
var_dump($obj->someFloatWithHook = 42); // int(42)
?>
If I am correct, it means that the “This also implies that adding a set hook to
a property cannot change the result of the = operator” statement is a bit too
optimistic.
—Claude
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
