George Schlossnagle wrote: >> What is wrong with PHP 5.1? People don't *have* to upgrade to the >> unicode enabled PHP if they don't want to. And it would probably be >> "nice" to have that mode for some users, but should that be over our own >> back with multiple implementations of everything? > > > Are you suggesting that people who don't want unicode should stick with > 5.1 for perpetuity?
Assuming that 5.1 would be actively maintained and not just for bug fixes, I'd say that is a viable approach. There are plenty of sites that have no use for Unicode as nice as it may be, and much rather retain performance over useless (for them) functionality. Ilia -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
