Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > >>>Assuming that 5.1 would be actively maintained and not just for bug >>>fixes, I'd say that is a viable approach. There are plenty of sites that >>> have no use for Unicode as nice as it may be, and much rather retain >>>performance over useless (for them) functionality. >> >>So, you are saying that something like the namespace patch would be >>added between 5.1.2 and 5.1.3, for example? That doesn't make much >>sense to me. > > > True, but doing it between 5.1.1 and 5.2.0 would work.
Right, so effectively the 5.x and 6.x trees would mimic each other. Even major versions = unicode, odd version = non-unicode. I suppose it is an approach, but I think it is a confusing one. -Rasmus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
