Agreed it's not used very much. That's because people like me think it's
scary :) and that's _exactly_ what I was trying to say.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks
It's just something which to begin with isn't used that much.
Grep'ed phpweb/ for it and found 0 occurrences of break n; and I believe
the people developing it would be the ones who would know how to use it.
Andi
At 02:33 PM 2/18/2006, Steph Fox wrote:
I personally find working with numbers difficult, which is why I'm wholly
in support of this patch.
I doubt I'm the only PHP user with that issue, due to the 'ease of use'
that allows people with no history of computer science to write useful
scripts (for which, thank you all). But I wouldn't expect a great deal of
sympathy on that point from CS graduates.
nb I think implementing goto/equivalent itself is a fairly bad idea - I
appear to be in the minority on that issue. But I don't see any problem
with introducing labels, I just see it as a more user-friendly way of
allowing nested breaks.
Am I very wrong?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steph Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] True labelled breaks
I think that in 1997 when break/continue n where implemented it would
have been a nice idea, but at this stage except for being more elegant
than break/continue n it doesn't truly add anything substantial to PHP
(and as you already mentioned it's orthogonal to the goto discussion). I
think having more than 1 way of doing the same thing, in this case, might
just end up confusing people developing with PHP (i.e. the Perl way :)
Just for the record I am coming at this from an open mind. Dmitry did
spend time on this patch, etc...
I'd recommend to bed it once and for all.
At 09:16 AM 2/18/2006, Steph Fox wrote:
Guys and guyess,
Sara and Dmitry's patch to introduce labelled breaks was discussed on
internals@ ever-so-briefly at the beginning of December, but there was
never any decision made over it.
Given that practically everyone who survived the preceding GOTO
discussion seemed to think it was a good idea at the time, could you
please re-visit it, evaluate it, discuss it (as opposed to talking about
GOTO, which is unrelated) and either OK it or put it to bed for once and
for all?
Relevant summary is at
http://www.zend.com/zend/week/week265.php#Heading3
Relevant patch is at http://www.zend.com/zend/week/pat/index.php
And if it's worth anything, +1 from me.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
__________ NOD32 1.1380 (20060125) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
__________ NOD32 1.1380 (20060125) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
