Hi Rasmus,

On Feb 6, 2008 2:13 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Brown wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
> >>> functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
> >>     Personally....
> >>
> >>     XX
> >
> >     VOTE CHANGED
> >
> >     -1
> >
> >     After a quick off-list discussion with Hannes (gotta' love Gmail
> > chat), I realized that I forgot to consider backwards-compatibility.
>
> I think a lot of people miss the point of these particular functions.
> This isn't about whether to keep magic quotes or not, it is whether to
> keep the function that tells you whether magic quote mangling is
> enabled.  There is a lot of code out there that checks to see if this
> feature is on, and deals with that case.  Having this function that
> simply tells the code to take the other path will allow it to work.
> This is not about restoring the magic quotes feature at all.

Exactly, I thought it was clear.

As I can see it was, the votes (not that much ;) in favor of keeping
the functions argue about your example, keep the if
(get_magic_quotes_gpc...) working without changes (if (php6)...).

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to