Hello Stefan, so at th eend of the day users will get renaming and will abuse it. That said I am wondering if at the beginning we might want to do Traits without aliasing and dropping. If we feel it gets necessary we probbaly might want to support a syntax like: 'trait_method' => false 'trait_method' => 'new_name' 'trait_method' => array('new_name', 'trait_method'
I am suggesting this because it is more what people expect to find. And it is easier to understand imo. marcus Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 10:59:20 PM, you wrote: > Hi Evert, >> Aliasing doesn't make a lot of sense, as you can always : >> >> function newMethod() { >> return $this->oldMethod(); >> } > Don't think so. > You do use aliasing to handle conflicts and in the case of a conflict > there is no oldMethod. > trait A { > public function foo() {echo 'foo';} > } > trait B { > public function foo() {echo 'fooBar';} > } > class MyClass { > use A; > use B { > !foo, fooBar => foo > } > } > The result will be at runtime: > class MyClass { > public function foo() {echo 'foo';} > public function foo() {echo 'fooBar';} > } > Here you can't do something like this: > class MyClass { > use A; > use B; > } > since eventually there wont be any method in MyClass. Best regards, Marcus -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php