2009/3/25 Lukas Kahwe Smith <m...@pooteeweet.org>:
>
> On 19.03.2009, at 14:32, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After having seen some complaints about ticks being deprecated I'm
>> wondering if they could be un-deprecated for now.
>>
>> Ticks are used by the pcntl extension to call signal handlers when
>> signals are triggered. I added some functions as an alternative, but
>> this does not covers all use cases (and forces a code change).
>>
>> When searching bug reports about ticks, one can feel the ticks to be
>> broken (and this is why they have been deprecated). However, looking in
>> depth at these bugs and viewing what caused them and how they have been
>> fixed does not show really bad things about ticks.
>>
>> Actually one thing is broken (and is marked as such in the
>> documentation), tick functions do not work in ZTS, this looks fixable.
>>
>> Any thoughts on removing the deprecation warning for now ? (at least
>> until a replacement is found).
>>
>> Sorry for posting this so close to the freeze.
>
>
> So what is it going to be?
> I remember everybody was happy when it was deprecated. But I think everybody
> ran under the impression that ticks is evil.
> Indeed the only open ticket is #47198, which is the doc bug. Or did we close
> tons of ticks bugs because it was deprecated?

If ticks will be fixable in ZTS then I will be +1 for fixing them and
undeprecating them, as its not a new feature but a bug fix.

>



-- 
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to