> Oh no .. another dangerous topic. Again we have been there even before the > switch. The idea is to keep the centralized repo on svn, because the masses > know how it works, the tools are widely available and we have plenty of > experience among us in how to keep svn running. I see little incentive to > move the _central_ repo to a DVCS. Are the bridges to git, mercurial, bzaar > etc really so bad that this topic is worth discussing (no sarcasm, honest > question)?
I only have experience with git. The problem with something like git-svn is that your git branch becomes an island. I can't share that branch with anyone else. So all I really get is git syntax within an svn environment. I have no problem working with svn and actually prefer it for projects that use a compiler. For PHP apps, git is great because nothing has to be built. Bouncing between git branches means I have to recompile PHP every time (or set up some system of symlinks). -- Herman Radtke hermanrad...@gmail.com | http://hermanradtke.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
