Personally, I think focusing on a character savings is the wrong
reason to take on any problem. I don't care how long it takes for me
to type code. I don't care how much extra hdd space it takes. But
what I do care about is how readable it is.
To me, the array shortcut syntax is pointless. Do you really mean to
tell me that `[1, 2]` is more readable/easier to understand than
`array(1,2)`? To me, it's about a wash.
However, the object shortcut syntax is a major win. For example:
$person = new stdClass();
$person->city = 'ogden';
$person->state = 'ut';
$perspn->country = 'usa';
$person->favoriteNumbers = array(4, 12, 37, 42);
$person->somethingWithNumbers();
$person->unluckyNumbers = array(6, 13, 21);
$person->likesPhp = 'very much so';
vs
$person = { 'name' => 'Justin',
'city' => 'ogden',
'state' => 'ut',
'country' => 'usa',
'favoriteNumbers' => [ 4, 12, 37, 42],
'unluckyNumbers' => [ 6, 13, 21],
'likesPhp' => 'very much so'
}
Did you notice what happened there? There's two differences. Try to
find them. Neither would be possible with the shortcut syntax.
Now, the only reason I would personally support the array shortcut is
if it was an implementation of JSON. I know that's not on the table
here, but that's the only benefit I can see to implementing a shortcut
for arrays (that would save 5 characters per instance).
Just my $0.02...
Anthony
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Justin Carmony <jus...@justincarmony.com> wrote:
> To address the soapbox:
>
> Its not just to reduce the five characters at the beginning, but when you
> have more complex structures as well. There was already a great example shown
> (http://paste.roguecoders.com/p/0747f2363c228a09e0ddd6f8ec52f2e8.html) of
> that. Also, if object support is added (which we need to add to the RFC), you
> can cut down on a lot more verbose code, especially with objects.
>
> $person = { 'name' => 'Justin',
> 'city' => 'ogden',
> 'state' => 'ut',
> 'country' => 'usa',
> 'favoriteNumbers' => [ 4, 12, 37, 42],
> 'unluckyNumbers' => [ 6, 13, 21],
> 'likesPhp' => 'very much so'
> };
>
> Characters: 192
>
> Current way:
>
> $person = new stdClass();
> $person->city = 'ogden';
> $person->state = 'ut';
> $person->country = 'usa';
> $person->favoriteNumbers = array(4, 12, 37, 42);
> $person->unluckyNumbers = array(6, 13, 21);
> $person->likesPhp = 'very much so';
>
> Characters: 229
>
> That is a 37 character difference. But the real driving factor is given PHP's
> lack of named parameter syntax, passing objects and arrays (or sometimes a
> mix, depending on the framework) is becoming very popular. So not only do you
> save some typing just once, but if you use this pattern a lot, you save a lot
> of typing over your entire project. Also, when dealing with objects, I have
> to make sure I retype "person" correctly each time. If I don't, I'll get a
> notice error. But with the new syntax, it'll throw a parsing error so I can
> know a lot quicker what my issue is.
>
> As for syntax highlighters, IDEs, books, etc all being outdated, first off no
> one is suggesting to deprecate the array() function. So you will only use
> this new syntax if you choose to do so. Second, we broke syntax highlighters,
> IDEs, and so forth when we introduced namespaces, and every IDE and syntax
> highlighter I used updated very quickly to support them. I'm assuming the
> IDEs spent a great deal more time adding Namespacing support than it will to
> support a short syntax for arrays and objects.
>
> PHP has made short syntax for other things, such a if statement short codes.
> Yet many books don't cover it, since it is one of those things you read in
> the documentation later and decide "Do I want to use this?" No one is forcing
> anyone to use (1 == 1 ? true : false) type of if/then logic. The same will
> work with the new syntax.
>
> My two cents.
>
> Justin
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Michael Shadle wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I modified the vote page, pls move your votes to the desired syntax
>>> (or global -1)
>>
>> This is a good idea to group things like this.
>>
>> Back on the soapbox. All of this is just to reduce typing "array" (5
>> characters) before things?
>>
>> Old:
>> $foo = array('a' => 'b', 'c' => 'd');
>>
>> More than likely new:
>> $foo = ['a' => 'b', 'c' => 'd'];
>>
>> 5 character difference for each array being saved. That's it. At the
>> expense of syntax highlighters, IDEs, books, all becoming outdated and
>> need to be updated. For a language construct that has been around for
>> what, 10 years?
>>
>> Oh, and for anyone desiring a ":" for this new shorthand, why stop at
>> array shorthand. Why not change this from:
>> foreach($foo as $key => $val)
>>
>> To:
>> foreach($foo as $key: $val)
>>
>> That would save one character for each array iteration like that.
>>
>> Also - if we're worried about saving characters and shorthand why not
>> just remove the "$" language construct? That's a LOT of keystrokes. In
>> my WordPress install, that's 75,412 characters saved. Versus 6,960
>> "array(" matches, which would save 34,800 characters.
>>
>> These were quick examples from a coworker. Just another PHP user who
>> said "wait why would they make another way to express an array?"
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
