On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Joe Watkins <krak...@php.net> wrote: > On 10/07/2013 11:20 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: > >> On 7 October 2013 11:13, Joe Watkins <krak...@php.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Morning Chaps, >>> >>> On the advice of many, I have restarted the vote, sorry for the >>> inconvenience/confusion ... >>> >> >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**anonymous_classes#voting<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes#voting>(re-link, >> for the lazy) >> >> The voting options changed from choosing a version ("5.6", "5.7") or >> rejecting… too a much simpler, yes/no for sticking this into master. >> Which >> branch/release the feature makes it into is something to be decided down >> the line (ultimately, by the RMs). >> >> >> >>> Cheers >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >> Morning All, > > To anyone who has voted or will vote no; if you have voted no but > is something that could be done to the patch to change your mind, please do > speak up :) > > If you voted/will vote no and there's nothing that can change your > mind, I'd still be interested in hearing the reasoning ... > > This is a pretty quiet vote ... as this is the first RFC I have > put forward, I'd like a bit more feedback so I can avoid the avoidable in > the future ... > > > Cheers > Joe > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I have voted no based on the lack of support for serialization/unserialization, and I think that we agreed that without somehow naming the class, we can't support that, and having a name would defeat the purpose of this feature.
I'm looking forward to nested classes though. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu
