Hi Joe, Thanks for your hard work on anonymous classes.
I voted no because I feel it's just adding more and more ways to achieve similar results and the syntax is just more sugary fluff to allow people to do things the wrong way. We've had a lot of new features in recent versions, i.e: traits, so I believe this isn't something PHP needs right now and PHP needs to focus on bug fixing and solidifying what we have right now. Thanks, Paul On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Joe Watkins <krak...@php.net> wrote: > On 10/07/2013 11:20 AM, Peter Cowburn wrote: > >> On 7 October 2013 11:13, Joe Watkins <krak...@php.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Morning Chaps, >>> >>> On the advice of many, I have restarted the vote, sorry for the >>> inconvenience/confusion ... >>> >> >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**anonymous_classes#voting<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/anonymous_classes#voting>(re-link, >> for the lazy) >> >> The voting options changed from choosing a version ("5.6", "5.7") or >> rejecting… too a much simpler, yes/no for sticking this into master. >> Which >> branch/release the feature makes it into is something to be decided down >> the line (ultimately, by the RMs). >> >> >> >>> Cheers >>> Joe >>> >>> >>> >> Morning All, > > To anyone who has voted or will vote no; if you have voted no but > is something that could be done to the patch to change your mind, please do > speak up :) > > If you voted/will vote no and there's nothing that can change your > mind, I'd still be interested in hearing the reasoning ... > > This is a pretty quiet vote ... as this is the first RFC I have > put forward, I'd like a bit more feedback so I can avoid the avoidable in > the future ... > > > Cheers > Joe > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
