> -----Original Message----- > From: JoshyPHP [mailto:php...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 3:59 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: Ferenc Kovacs; Laruence; PHP Internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About PHP NG "document lacking" argument > > On 25 July 2014 14:14, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > >> I do think that some people simply doesn't like phpng (for reasons > >> mostly not on technical grounds), and they are bringing up any issue > >> which can hinder the acceptance of phpng. > > > > I think you hit the nail on the head, Ferenc. That's why I'm > > reluctant to participate in this game. > > Do you realize that "I think that some people are doing bad things" is a > vague > character assassination?
I'd prefer that over a non-vague and very public character assassination that me and others are experiencing instead. I'm also wondering why you're replying to me, when it's Ferenc that made the statement (that I backed). Ferenc, as an 'innocent bystander', sees things the way they are in a non-biased way. I think most active participants here know exactly what he's talking about. > The other side of that argument is "I feel like some > companies *wink* *wink* develop things in secret then pressure the list > into > accepting them blindly." I'm done apologizing for helping to almost double PHP's performance. I'm also done explaining why that was the only practical way, which should be obvious considering how we can't even agree on required majorities should be obvious, and was always the way major versions came to be (with the exception of PHP 6, RIP). Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
