Hi Pierre, On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please suggest better/right way. Having namespace is not alternative for > > having consistent names. > > I think I did, and many other. But you seem to be convinced that > consistency in names is the top priority and will suddenly make these > APIs easier to use. I think we should agree to disagree and move to > vote. I do not see any value in this discussion since quite some time, > it is hair splitting solutions for naming, namespace, etc while not > having an agreement on how and where to do it, except the std C names. I agree namespace can be used to fix naming/parameter issues with zero BC. What I'm saying here is We need new name function (and documentations/codes update) anyway We may provide new names and new parameter order in new namespace. The difference is "alias" or "namespace" basically. I don't object to use namespace for it at all. In fact, I would love to have it even if there is issue like writing extremely difficult to read code is possible. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
