Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> schreef op 15 maart 2015 17:59:17 GMT+00:00: >On 15/03/2015 14:19, Anthony Ferrara wrote: >> All, >> >> I ran some numbers on the current votes of the dual-mode vote right >> now. There were a number of voters that I didn't recognize. So I >> decided to pull some stats. >> >> The following voters never voted before the dual-mode RFC went up: >> >> dom - no >> eliw - no >> kguest - yes >> kk - no >> nohn - no >> oliver - yes >> richsage - yes >> sammywg - no >> spriebsch - no >> srain - no >> theseer - no >> zimt - no >> >> Some of these names I recognize from list (sammywg and eliw), but >many I do not. >> >> The interesting thing happens when you look at the voting direction. >> >> Currently, the RFC is slightly losing 70:37 (65.4%). >> >> If we look at percentages, 4.2% of yes voters have never voted in a >> prior RFC. But a whopping 24.3% of no voters have never voted before. > >I think calling this an "irregularity" is going a bit far. I don't think it's going to far, if you have people with no clue writing this:
https://plus.google.com/+KristianK%C3%B6hntopp/posts/ijoDNH2M8mB Which post says that we're turning PHP into Java. And to this misguided FUD post, that actively asks people to vote no, I can quite easily attribute a few more no votes of people that had never voted before... Too late to tighten up the rules for this one, but something is definitely not right with the current process. Cheers, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org twitter: @derickr and @xdebug -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
