Hi Patrick 2015-04-29 0:10 GMT+02:00 Patrick ALLAERT <patrickalla...@php.net>: > "No go"? Isn't that a bit rough?
Well we need to be fair and hold our own policies/processes we agree to true, else there is no point in having them. > > That kind of change normally doesn't require an RFC at all. We did one for > documentation purpose instead of just a PR and a mail saying "ok for 7?". > > Refusing this because we actually did an RFC to *document* it goes in the > opposite direction of encouraging people to create them. > > Isn't this just a documented "no brainer"? As Adam said, if this was just committed, it would have been asked to be reverted because now is the time to focus on stabilizing. If we are to keep our promise by having a release this year, we cannot afford these small things, and that even involes my tiny improvement to memory_get[_peak]_usage() the other day as it does not contribute to that (no matter how redudant my small patch were). I would love to see more work toward identifying issues in PHP7, and hopefully we can get that once we release the first alpha. -- regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen ka...@php.net -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
