On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Pedro Cordeiro <pedronar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wouldn't this give the same benefit as trailing commas when it comes to > > adding removing arguments - a single line diff? > > It would. > > However, I see some merit in someone wanting trailing commas for diffs. > Leading commas would break away from PSRs and one should not have to choose > between a standard or clean reading. > > If someone chooses to lose their precious time implementing this, it would > actually give some people a new feature (clean diffs while keeping PSR2 > compliance) without taking anything away from people who oppose this. This > is not objectively bad, it just adds an option to the pool, which I think > is good. > > I see no reason to allocate resources to make this happen, but if someone > does allocate their personal time into coding this, I wouldn't oppose a > merge. > > But again, I have no vote. > > I want to clarify, I have no objection to this - was just asking if making the decision that way back then at FB would have merited the same result. I'm in your boat, whether its added or not does not matter to me.
