joseph minor wrote: > I also have extensive experience with DTM mumps. Again, earlier versions > (pre 6.0 ) were a little unstable, specifically when the PC lost power while > DTM was running. But then a power failure use to corrupt any DOS file, so that was no surprise.
> I have several clients using Cache, my first involvement coming with version > 2.1. Through numerous upgrades, I can truly say that I have never had any > problems with data integrity using Cache ( knock on wood ). That's what I like to hear.
