John A Bertoglio wrote: > The built in web server's only role is serving Cache documentation. Is that the official ISC position now? That makes it uneconomical. Code should be re-usable.
> The only reason it is included is that some development machines do > not have a standard web server running. Perhaps some reasons are deprecated, but to say that this is the only reason misses all the other reasons. > Therefore, it has a limited feature set. I think the reason is that ISC didn't invest in more features. > This also limits its system impact. Makes sense, IMHO. I don't follow your reasoning. I see nothing wrong with an internal webserver to support an entire website that is largely driven by CSP. This limits adverse system impact and makes sense, imo. Using Apache is a waste of memory and CPU resources when a simple COS routine is all you need.
