"Ram�n Jim�nez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Denver Braughler wrote: > > > I see nothing wrong with an internal webserver to support an entire > > website that is largely driven by CSP. > > This limits adverse system impact and makes sense, imo. > > I think the problem is that users will then want to do lots of stuff > with this Web server in addition to serve CSP. Like standard security, > CGI, ActiveX and whatnot. Hence putting ISC in the position of having to > support a Web server, when in fact they are moving *away* from it... >
Not to mention the ability to manage thread pools, TCP/IP connections and other things I don't fully understand. > > Using Apache is a waste of memory and CPU resources when a simple COS routine > > is all you need. > > ... and are indeed bundling the very Apache with 5.1 and dropping 1972 > as Web server altogether. At least I read it here a couple of months > ago, from Bill. > Hope you are right. On top of everything else, the existance of the webserver is a potential security hole. Cache has been lucky in that a lot of its success from major hacking has derived from its obscurity. I wonder what would happend if a million world-wide hackers started tearing it apart? -- John Bertoglio Senior Consultant co-laboratory office: 503-538-8691 mobile: 503.330.6713 fax: 503.538.8691 www.co-laboratory.com > -- > ZCacheLib - Open Source Extensions for Cach� > http://www.zcachelib.org
