John A. Bertoglio wrote: > > "George R Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exactly Kevin !! > > Hard to argue with Kevin's point. The only downside is that the base > price would have to be quite high and this might turn off potential > customers as much as leaving the question open.
surely this is the very issue we are talking of, somewhere, somehow, ISC ask a lot (or not many) questions of the potential client, then sit down and look at "tables" to see what it would cost for something like this to happen. they must be adding things like 20 of those, a pinch of that, throw in a few of those, don't want those, must have that and then says "that will be $42 please" I have no doubt someone somewhere goes off, asks questions about more specialist subjects but still comes back , looks up a table and says "that will be $43 please - the extra $ is for the oojamaflip you want to implement." I am not suggesting for one moment to publish the tables, but having an approximate guideline ball-park figure would be nice. kev
