kevin furze wrote: > inside the <!--#INCLUDE FILE="filename"--> documentation, it mentions > "good programming practice to use the INC extension" I don't know why.
I find the overloading of the generic ".inc" extension annoying at the least. A good practice might be ".inc.csp" or ".csinc". But ".inc" alone is nearly meaningless, an incomplete. :) Still, ISC should practice what it preaches. That was a good job isolating the bug; you did a favor for all of us who haven't updated yet.
