http://www.aawsat.net/2013/05/article55300425



Written by : Ahmet Gencturk 
on : Wednesday, 1 May, 2013 
0 
 Print This Post 
PKK Waves Flag of Islam 
Öcalan will win political points by embracing Islam
ANATOLIAN DISPATCHES blog: Posts from across the Bosporus. The Republic of 
Turkey is turning its attention eastwards and proving itself a heavyweight in 
the Middle East arena. ‘Anatolian Dispatches’ sets the compass to the new 
Turkish orientation. 
 
Pro-Kurdish politicians Sirri Sureyya Onder (3rd L) and Pervin Buldan (6th R) 
read the statement of jailed Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan during a 
gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir 
March 21, 2013. Source: Reuters/Umit Bektas

Recent comments from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) leader Abdullah Öcalan 
puzzled groups that have long been allied with his party. In a letter that was 
read out to crowds gathered for the Kurdish New Year in Diyarbakır a few weeks 
ago, Öcalan emphasized the role of Islam as forming a strong bond between Kurds 
and Turks: “Turkish people who know ancient Anatolia as Turkey should know that 
their coexistence with Kurdish people dates back to a historical agreement of 
fraternity and solidarity under the flag of Islam.” His proclamations threw off 
some groups in the Turkish Left and the liberal Left, Armenians and Alevis that 
sympathized with the PKK and supported its progressive-secular agenda.

Originally founded as a Marxist organization in 1978, the PKK had to revise its 
ideology in the early 1990s. Like many other Marxist–Leninist organizations in 
the world, the PKK lost its main source of ideological legitimacy when the 
Soviet bloc disintegrated and capitalism appeared to have won an absolute 
victory. Furthermore, Öcalan, as well as others within the PKK leadership, 
gradually came to the conclusion that Islam was too important for a Kurdish 
party to ignore, given that many Kurds are devout Muslims.

This shift did not mean that the PKK dropped its secular, progressive 
discourse, which continued to generate sympathy among Turkish leftist 
organizations as well as some Western Left and liberal Left academic circles. 
Rather, it reconciled its secular-nationalist ideology with Islam, hailed as a 
revolutionary idea by Öcalan in his various writings and speeches. The PKK’s 
secular allies, which once opted to ignore the stance developed by the PKK on 
Islam or underestimated it as a conjectural policy, were troubled when they 
came to understand that Islam is seen as a strategic asset by Öcalan.

Given the fact that the PKK has to compete against Prime Minister Erdoğan’s 
conservative Justice and Development Party and the extremist Turkish Hezbollah 
for domination in the Kurdish-majority provinces, it is very logical for the 
PKK to acknowledge the importance of Islam and act accordingly. In embracing 
Islam, the PKK may also be able to erase the Turkish public’s opinion of it as 
an atheist terror organization: the organization could reach wider segments of 
Turkish society and eventually transform itself into a legitimate political 
actor in Turkey.

On the other hand, Öcalan’s new discourse will likely alienate some groups 
among the PKK’s supporters. The Kurdish Alevis and the Kurdish elites living in 
Europe, with their strong secular tendencies, will not be pleased with the 
PKK’s embrace of Islam. They may break away from the PKK in order to join other 
pro-Kurdish organizations, such as the Maoist Communist Party, the 
Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party–Front, or one of the other Leftist 
organizations that have accused the PKK of betraying its revolutionary cause 
and of serving as a tool for imperialism in the Middle East.

Öcalan, who is detained on an island prison in the Marmara Sea, sees the 
realities of Turkey better than the marginalized extreme Left—and he makes his 
long-term plans accordingly. In this regard, he recognizes the historic Islamic 
reality in the Middle East, the need for maintaining good relations with it, 
and the benefits of exploiting it when and where possible.




Ahmet Gencturk
Ahmet Gencturk is a PhD candidate at the Panteion University where he 
researches the relation between the Greek Church and the Ottoman State in the 
nineteenth century. He is also a researcher at the Centre for Mediterranean, 
Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (CEMMIS) and is co-editor of the Centre's 
Turkey Report. He lives in Athens.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke