http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/05-01-2014/126547-mandela_gaddafi-0/


Mandela and Gaddafi: the myth of the Saint and the Mad Dog
05.01.2014
"Question. Why was Mandela's life celebrated by the world while Gaddafi 
after everything he did for Africa was gunned down like a dog?", a Twitter 
user wondered days after Nelson Mandela's passing.

by Linda Housman

This question becomes even more valid in light of what the mainstream 
media, in the wake of the former South African president's death, have 
been anxiously hiding from the public: the actual close and crucial 
alliance between Mandela and Gaddafi. Back in the 70s and 80s, when the 
West refused to allow sanctions against Apartheid in South Africa and used 
to call Mandela a terrorist, it was none other than Libya's Muammar 
Gaddafi who kept supporting him. Gaddafi funded Mandela's fight against 
Apartheid by training ANC fighters and by paying for their education 
abroad, and their bond only became stronger after Mandela's release from 
prison on February 11, 1990.

Nevertheless, one of them ended up being "gunned down like a dog" and his 
death was celebrated by the entire elite of the imperialist world, which 
celebrations were significantly summarized by Hillary "Warzone" Clinton in 
a now infamous interview in which she exults: "We came, we saw, he died!"

As for the other one, the same entire elite of the imperialist world 
crowded into the FNB stadium in Soweto, South Africa, to attend the 
funeral of their hero, and to verbosely praise Mandela and his 
achievements with all possible superlatives.

Mandela on Gaddafi

So how did the branded Saint Mandela really feel about the branded Mad Dog 
Gaddafi? Let's hear straight from the horse's mouth what the mainstream 
media have left out of their laudatory picture of the former ANC leader.

Right upon his release from prison, after more than 27 years behind bars, 
Mandela broke the UN embargo and paid a visit to the Libyan capital of 
Tripoli, where he declared: "My delegation and I are overjoyed with the 
invitation from the Brother Guide [Muammar Gaddafi], to visit the Great 
Popular and Socialist Arab Libyan Jamahiriya. I have been waiting 
impatiently ever since we received the invitation. I would like to remind 
you that the first time I came here, in 1962, the country was in a very 
different state of affairs. One could not but be struck by the sights of 
poverty from the moment of arrival, with all of its usual corollaries: 
hunger, illness, lack of housing and of health-care facilities, etc. Anger 
and revolt could be read in those days on the faces of everyone.

Since then, things have changed considerably. During our stay in prison, 
we read and heard a great deal about the changes which have come about in 
this country and about blossoming of the economy which has been 
experienced here. There is prosperity and progress everywhere here today 
which we were able to see even before the airplane touched ground. It is 
thus with great pleasure that we have come on a visit in the Jamahiriya, 
impatient to meet our brother, the Guide Gaddafi."

When Mandela was taken to the ruins of Gaddafi's compound in Tripoli, 
which was bombed by the Reagan administration in 1986 in an attempt to 
murder the entire Gaddafi family, he said:

"No country can claim to be the policeman of the world and no state can 
dictate to another what it should do. Those that yesterday were friends of 
our enemies have the gall today to tell me not to visit my brother 
Gaddafi. They are advising us to be ungrateful and forget our friends of 
the past."

In response, Gaddafi thanked Mandela for his friendship, saying: "Who 
would ever have said that one day the opportunity for us to meet would 
become reality. We would like you to know that we are constantly 
celebrating your fight and that of the South African people, and that we 
salute your courage during all of those long years you spent in detention 
in the prison of Apartheid. Not a single day has passed without us having 
thought of you and your sufferings."

Eight years later, when then U.S. president Bill Clinton visited Mandela 
in March 1998, Clinton criticized the South African president's meeting 
with Muammar Gaddafi. In reaction to that criticism, Mandela 
straightforwardly replied:

"I have also invited Brother Leader Gaddafi to this country. And I do that 
because our moral authority dictates that we should not abandon those who 
helped us in the darkest hour in the history of this country. Not only did 
the Libyans support us in return, they gave us the resources for us to 
conduct our struggle, and to win. And those South Africans who have 
berated me for being loyal to our friends, can literally go and jump into 
a pool."

Mandela on the West

Subsequently, let's hear the ANC leader's real thoughts on the West that 
has put him on a posthumous pedestal, and on topics that, to say the 
least, are not exactly popular among Western leaders.

On the U.S. preparing its war against Iraq in 2002: "If you look at those 
matters, you will come to the conclusion that the attitude of the United 
States of America is a threat to world peace. If there is a country that 
has committed unspeakable atrocities in the world, it is the USA. They 
don't care for human beings."

In a 1999 speech: "Israel should withdraw from all the areas which it won 
from the Arabs in 1967, and in particular Israel should withdraw 
completely from the Golan Heights, from south Lebanon and from the West 
Bank."

"The UN took a strong stand against apartheid; and over the years, an 
international consensus was built, which helped to bring an end to this 
iniquitous system. But we know too well that our freedom is incomplete 
without the freedom of the Palestinians." (RT)

The revolutionary Mad Dog

On the day of Mandela's funeral, December 15, 2013, a citizen from Accra, 
Ghana, expressed:

"All day long here in Ghana they have been broadcasting live the Memorial 
Service of Nelson Mandela in South Africa. Courtesy, of course, of the BBC 
and Deutsche Welle? Why on earth doesn't Africa have its own Broadcasting 
Network in this day and age? The news coverage on the BBC is always 
distorting according to their own interest, and that on Deutsche Welle a 
bit less, but still not African! And in all of Ghana - a nations with so 
many media resources - there is not a single foreign correspondent in the 
lot! Why must Africans always depend on others to tell their own stories 
to them?! Shame! Shame! Shame!"

In fact, there actually was someone working on an African broadcasting 
network. Someone who already connected the entire African continent by 
radio, television and telephone. In the early 90s, this person funded the 
establishment of the Regional African Satellite Communication 
Organization, which eventually provided Africa with its first own 
communications satellite on December 26, 2007. A second African satellite 
was launched in July 2010 and advanced plans for a continental 
broadcasting network were made. The person who funded at least 70% of this 
revolutionary project was the revolutionary leader of the Libyan 
Jamahiriya, Muammar Gaddafi.

Gaddafi thus angered the Western bankers, since Africa no longer would pay 
the annual $500 million fee to Europe for the use of its satellites, and 
of course no "self-respecting" banker was willing to fund a project that 
frees people from their claws. And this was not the only way in which 
Gaddafi angered the West to the point that he had to be eliminated from 
their agenda. The leader of the Libyan Al-Fateh Revolution worked hard and 
came close to embody the famous 1865 quote by American economist Adam 
Smith, saying: "The economy of any country which relies on the slavery of 
blacks is destined to descend into hell the day those countries awaken."

On the eve of the NATO-led war against Libya, Gaddafi's booming country 
largely co-funded three projects that would rid Africa from its financial 
dependence on the West once and for all: the African Investment Bank in 
the Libyan city of Sirte, the African Monetary Fund (AFM), to be based in 
the capital of Cameroon, Yaounde, in 2011, and the African Central Bank to 
be based in the capital of Nigeria, Abuja. Especially the latter angered 
France - not coincidentally also the main orchestrator of the war on 
Libya - because it would mean the end of the West African CFA franc and 
the Central African CFA franc, through which France kept a hold on as much 
as thirteen African countries. Only two months after Africa said no to 
Western attempts to join the AFM, Western organized "protests" against the 
AFM's  benefactor, Muammar Gaddafi, started to erupt in Libya... 
ultimately resulting in the freezing of $30 billion by the West, which 
money mostly was intended for the above mentioned financial projects.

But Gaddafi helped the African continent in more than just material ways. 
More than any other African leader, he supported Mandela's ANC's struggle 
against the racist regime in South Africa. Above that, many Black 
Africans, especially sub-Saharan African migrants and refugees, found a 
new home in Gaddafi's prosperous Libya.

Gaddafi understood that in order to develop a strong Africa that would be 
able to finally throw off the shackles of imperialism, unity was the first 
requirement. The 2009 Chairperson of the African Union also understood the 
African culture and recognized that African problems need African 
solutions. During a 2010 meeting in Tripoli, in which he addressed dozens 
of leaders from across Africa, he told: "African traditions are being 
replaced with Western culture and multiparty politics is destroying 
Africa." Instead, Gaddafi promoted the establishment of a People's 
Government (Jamahiriya) in which the power would not belong to (puppet) 
governments, but to the African people. And nothing scared the Western 
capitalists more than a united Africa - Muammar Gaddafi's dream that was 
about to come true by the end of 2010.

The lukewarm Saint

When Nelson Mandela endured 27 years of isolation in prison, he paid the 
price of being the socialist revolutionary and the racial equality fighter 
that he was. His freedom was taken away by the South African Apartheid 
regime, a regime that was the result of the infiltration of South Africa 
by European colonial powers. How come the same colonial powers now 
consider him to be a hero and a saint? Did the Western elite have a 
massive change of mind, and thus all of the sudden embraced the exact same 
ideology that made them put Mandela behind bars a few decades ago?

We only have to take a look at the current situation of the Blacks in 
NATO-led Libya to understand that this was not quite the case. Libya, in 
1951 officially the poorest country in the world, under Gaddafi attained 
the highest standard of living in Africa. The country's prosperity 
attracted many Black African immigrants, during the 2011 war on Libya by 
the mainstream media purposely misnamed as being "black sub-Saharan 
African mercenaries". Gaddafi provided them with work and education. Those 
immigrant workers, to whom Gaddafi was a hero, a father and a friend, now 
face the cruelest forms of racism by the Western-installed Libyan puppet 
regime. Just one telling example is a video in which Libyan "rebels" force 
Black immigrants to eat the green flag of the Libyan Jamahiriya.

Then why the 180 degrees change of attitude of the West towards Mandela 
after his release from prison?

Statistics show that still 65% of the Blacks in South Africa remain 
unemployed, while 90% of the Whites own 90% of South Africa's wealth. Over 
the last decades, Apartheid may have disappeared for the visual scene, 
fact is that Blacks remain poor while Whites remain rich.

Yet the West regards Mandela as the protector of the South African 
economy. According to a Financial Times journalist, Mandela's ANC "proved 
a reliable steward of sub-Sahara Africa's largest economy, embracing 
orthodox fiscal and monetary policies." Canadian The Globe and Mail 
recently added that Mandela did this "without alienating his radical 
followers or creating a dangerous factional struggle within his movement".

In other words, Mandela ran with the hare and hunted with the hounds... 
mainly economically - and nothing interested, interests and will interest 
the Western capitalist countries more than economics.

As aptly stated by independent writer Stephen Gowans,

"Thus, in [The Globe and Mail journalist Doug] Saunder's view, Mandela was 
a special kind of leader: one who could use his enormous prestige and 
charisma to induce his followers to sacrifice their own interests for the 
greater good of the elite that had grown rich off their sweat, going so 
far as to acquiesce in the repudiation of their own economic program."

""Here is the crucial lesson of Mr. Mandela for modern politicians," 
writes Saunders. "The principled successful leader is the one who betrays 
his party members for the larger interests of the nation. When one has to 
decide between the rank-and-file and the greater good, the party should 
never come first."

"For Saunders and most other mainstream journalists, "the larger interests 
of the nation" are the larger interests of banks, land owners, bond 
holders and share holders. This is the idea expressed in the old adage 
"What's good for GM [General Motors], is good for America." Since 
mainstream media are large corporations, interlocked with other large 
corporations, and are dependent on still other large corporations for 
advertising revenue, the placing of an equal sign between corporate 
interests and the national interest comes quite naturally."

I believe the dictionary has a word for that: lukewarm.

What if Mandela had not danced to the tune of the imperialists?What if he 
did have said words and did have made plans that were too threatening to 
the interests of the corporate financiers who run the planet - the reason 
why Gaddafi had to be killed? Then South Africa under his leadership quite 
likely would have become what Iraq and Libya currently are: a country in 
turmoil, torn apart by imperialist powers that Mandela, not inconceivable 
even out of fear for what they are capable of, preferred to side with.

Also the inevitable question arises: where was Mandela when his brother 
Gaddafi's country was bombed for nine months by the most powerful military 
alliance in modern history? Sources have declared by that time his health 
was too fragile and he was in a too vulnerable state of mind, for which 
reason his family deliberately kept him away from news that would severely 
upset him. Whatever the case may be, the significant fact remains that no 
ANC member stood up for Gaddafi during the war on Libya the way Gaddafi 
stood up for his friend Mandela during his imprisonment and afterwards.

The lesson for us

At the beginning of a new year, let us allow ourselves to take a few 
moments to reflect on our destiny and on that of the post-Mandela and 
post-Gaddafi world we live in. We live in a time of transition on all 
fronts. More than ever we are faced with the choice of being guided by 
fear - especially by the fear of losing credibility with the public and 
being punished by "authorities" when we challenge the powers-that-be - or 
being guided by the freedom of thought. The latter will result in a higher 
level of understanding of both ourselves and the world around us, which is 
the main condition for a much needed (r)evolution and for the 
establishment of true democracy.

What the world needs now, are "Mad Dogs". Revolutionaries with a vision 
who dare to be unconventional and dare to be so all the way. It is time 
for us to become a Gaddafi rather than a Mandela. It is time to let the 
walls of fear around our thinking fall away. It is time to break free from 
the fear of not being liked, of no longer being accepted, of being looked 
upon differently, of being branded an outcast, a lunatic, a conspiracy 
theorist or anything bad when we raise our voices.

We need to dare to totally tear aside the veil of Apartheid that mights 
and media use to cover up what is really going on in the world. Only then 
real progress can be achieved.

"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery;
None but ourselves can free our mind." - Bob Marley

--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 2402 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan 
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen

Kirim email ke