On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:29:32 +0800 Lu Baolu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2020/3/21 7:27, Jacob Pan wrote: > > Memory type related flags can be grouped together for one simple > > check. > > > > --- > > v9 renamed from EMT to MTS since these are memory type support > > flags. --- > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <[email protected]> > > --- > > include/uapi/linux/iommu.h | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h > > index 4ad3496e5c43..d7bcbc5f79b0 100644 > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h > > @@ -284,7 +284,10 @@ struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data_vtd { > > __u32 pat; > > __u32 emt; > > }; > > - > > +#define IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_MTS_MASK > > (IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_CD | \ > > + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_EMTE > > | \ > > + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PCD > > | \ > > + > > IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PWT) > > As name implies, can this move to intel-iommu.h? > I also thought about this but the masks are in vendor specific part of the UAPI. > Best regards, > baolu > > > /** > > * struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data - Information about device and > > guest PASID binding > > * @version: Version of this data structure > > [Jacob Pan] _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
