On 2020/3/28 0:05, Auger Eric wrote:
Hi Jacob,

On 3/27/20 12:55 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jacob Pan<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 7:28 AM

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan<[email protected]>
---
  drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c | 14 ++++----------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
index 191508c7c03e..9bdb7ee228b6 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-pasid.c
@@ -544,17 +544,11 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_second_level(struct
intel_iommu *iommu,
                return -EINVAL;
        }

-       /*
-        * Skip top levels of page tables for iommu which has less agaw
-        * than default. Unnecessary for PT mode.
-        */
        pgd = domain->pgd;
-       for (agaw = domain->agaw; agaw > iommu->agaw; agaw--) {
-               pgd = phys_to_virt(dma_pte_addr(pgd));
-               if (!dma_pte_present(pgd)) {
-                       dev_err(dev, "Invalid domain page table\n");
-                       return -EINVAL;
-               }
+       agaw = iommu_skip_agaw(domain, iommu, &pgd);
+       if (agaw < 0) {
+               dev_err(dev, "Invalid domain page table\n");
is the dev_err() really requested. I see in domain_setup_first_level(),
there is none.
+               return -EINVAL;
        }
ok, I see how it is used. possibly combine last and this one together since
it's mostly moving code...
I tend to agree with Kevin. May be better squash the 2 patches. Also not
sure the inline of iommu_skip_agaw() is meaningful then. Also Add commit
messages on the resulting patch.

Note domain_setup_first_level() also could use the helper while we are
it (if declaration moved to common helper). Only the error code differs
in case !dma_pte_present(pgd), ie. -ENOMEM. May be good to align.

Otherwise those stuff may be done in a fixup patch.

Agreed. Will squash these 2 patches with a meaningful commit message. As
for using this helper in other files, like domain_setup_first_level(),
we need more review and test efforts, hence it's better to put it in a
followup patch.

Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to