> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 5:44 PM
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:39:36AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Lu Baolu <baolu...@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 10:44 PM
> > >
> > > Tweak the I/O page fault handling framework to route the page faults to
> > > the domain and call the page fault handler retrieved from the domain.
> > > This makes the I/O page fault handling framework possible to serve more
> > > usage scenarios as long as they have an IOMMU domain and install a
> page
> > > fault handler in it. Some unused functions are also removed to avoid
> > > dead code.
> > >
> > > The iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() which retrieves attached
> domain
> > > for a {device, PASID} pair is used. It will be used by the page fault
> > > handling framework which knows {device, PASID} reported from the
> iommu
> > > driver. We have a guarantee that the SVA domain doesn't go away during
> > > IOPF handling, because unbind() waits for pending faults with
> > > iopf_queue_flush_dev() before freeing the domain. Hence, there's no
> need
> > > to synchronize life cycle of the iommu domains between the unbind() and
> > > the interrupt threads.
> >
> > I found iopf_queue_flush_dev() is only called in intel-iommu driver. Did
> > I overlook anything?
>
> The SMMU driver will need it as well when we upstream PRI support.
> Currently it only supports stall, and that requires the device driver to
> flush all DMA including stalled transactions *before* calling unbind(), so
> ne need for iopf_queue_flush_dev() in this case.
>
then it makes sense. Probably Baolu can add this information in the
commit msg so others with similar question can quickly get the
point here.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
