> "Baawaawaa, it's not written in My Language Of Choice, so > it must be > rewritten." That describes something like 49% of FOSS > projects > The other 49% is "baawaawaa, it's not Freeⓡ: it doesn't > use My > License of Choice". … > The remaining 2% may have some originality.
wmii is among that 2%: - it can be scripted in any language, also in your language of choice - it is free from restrictions; you may also sublicense it to your free license of choice ion fulfills neither. I assume you get that 98% of user unsatisfaction, if your 98%/2% numbers are correct. > > It's not imposed. As far as I know, nobody has to use Ion, > as it's > a marginal alternative among a gazillion other window > managers. Exactly. To those who feel too limited by ion's complexity or Tuomo's opinions, I would recommend wmii. I successfully migrated from ion3 to wmii and don't regret it. The migration is easy since they're feature-alike, and it's faster to customize. -- Daniel
