On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 08:28:43PM +0300, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: > A good scheme might be something like XrcN for development releases and > XpN for patches to major releases. Here X is some major milestone > identifier _and_ API version number in case of libraries and such (API > could change between rc:s, though) and N either a date or a number that > is incremented with each release (and reset when moving from rc to p). > Using such a scheme the current stable Ion would be 1p20020207 and the > development release 2rc20030606. (Maybe 'rc' could be split into 'd' for > snapshots and 'rc' for frozen code that is soon to go 'p'.)
That seems reasonable. Just as a little test, how would the last few versions have been labelled under this scheme? Jonathan.
