On 06/16/2016 12:55 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>>> + EM_BPF = 0xeb9f, // Linux kernel bpf virtual machine > > Great, can that be assumed the final magic e_machine number for the ELF > header that eBPF loaders can check for as well then (I do like 0xeb9f ;))?
I'm quite fond of 0xeb9f myself. ;-) I have sent a message to both [email protected] and [email protected]. We'll see if that produces a response within a reasonable time frame. Failing that, I'm tempted to just use 0xeb9f forever. r~ _______________________________________________ iovisor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev
