On 06/22/2016 10:27 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Using EM_NONE for the bpf backend e_machine value is less than optimal. >> With a unique value we can interact with other tools, e.g. objdump for >> disassembly. >> >> As a bonus, I noticed a few missing patterns that are useful to implement. > > Hi Richard, > > sounds like em number is now set to 247 and paper work filed?
Yes. > When should I expect v2 of these patches? > 3.9 release branch will be forked mid july. > would be great to get these changes in soon. I'm working on that today. r~ _______________________________________________ iovisor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev
