On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Richard Henderson via iovisor-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Using EM_NONE for the bpf backend e_machine value is less than optimal. > With a unique value we can interact with other tools, e.g. objdump for > disassembly. > > As a bonus, I noticed a few missing patterns that are useful to implement.
Hi Richard, sounds like em number is now set to 247 and paper work filed? When should I expect v2 of these patches? 3.9 release branch will be forked mid july. would be great to get these changes in soon. Thanks _______________________________________________ iovisor-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iovisor.org/mailman/listinfo/iovisor-dev
