Ah, I just realized if I had checked that earlier, this would have solved my issue!

As you can see in the other answer, I just didn't realize that there is a default network.

Thanks for the help! :)


Am 16.04.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Bob McMahon:
I'd look at three things on both ends

  * iptables -L (or firewall settings)
  * routing tables (ip route show all)
  * arp tables (arp -n) and the mac addresses (ifconfig)

to verify the end/end path.  Also, if there are switches in the middle dumping the switch address tables may be required

Bob

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Bruce A. Mah <b...@es.net <mailto:b...@es.net>> wrote:

    If memory serves me right, Marcel wrote:
    > Hey Bruce,
    >
    > thanks for the fast reply.
    >
    > Actually I'm using a Python script and therefor I get the IP of the
    > interface using netifaces.
    >
    > I also checked that using ifconfig while running the script and
    netstat
    > -an showed the same IP.
    >
    > Here was the output (using the IPs from before) while running
    the iperf3
    > command:
    >
    > tcp        0      1 12.34.56.78:12345 <http://12.34.56.78:12345>
    12.12.12.12:1111 <http://12.12.12.12:1111>      SYN_SENT
    >
    > I can't see what might be wrong here, do you have an idea where
    else I
    > could look for an issue?

    Hmmm...that looks pretty much normal to me...this is indeed more
    than a
    little odd.  It's weird that if you use "-B" to specify the outgoing
    address, it stops working even if you specify the same address the
    routing table would have picked anyway.  At the moment I can't
    think of
    anything to try next...I know that's not much help.

    Bruce.

    > Am 13.04.2018 um 20:25 schrieb Bruce A. Mah:
    >> If memory serves me right, Marcel wrote:
    >>
    >>> I'm trying to do an iperf3 test using a Huawei ME909 wwan
    modem on a
    >>> raspberry pi zero w.
    >>>
    >>> I use the command as iperf3 -c 12.12.12.12 -t 3 -p 5201 -B
    12.34.56.78
    >>>
    >>> where 12.12.12.12 is the ip of the server machine and
    12.34.56.78 is the
    >>> ip of the Huawei modem.
    >>>
    >>> With this command, I get a timeout error, but when I ommit the
    -B part
    >>> with the ip of the modem, iperf3 uses the wlan0 interface and
    behaves
    >>> normally.
    >>>
    >>> I should also mention that I connected the modem with AT commands
    >>> (AT+COPS, AT^NDISDUP) and when I do a ping over that interface
    it also
    >>> behaves as expected, but when I use a package size over 1300
    for ping, I
    >>> also get a timeout error.
    >>>
    >>> I'm quite new to this kind of stuff, so I would appreciate any
    help!
    >> Hi Marcel--
    >>
    >> Hmmm...I don't completely understand the networking setup, but the
    >> argument to -B is supposed to be the address of the network
    interface on
    >> the iperf3 client machine that you want to bind to.  So you're
    saying
    >> the Huawei modem presents an IP network interface with the address
    >> 12.34.56.78 (I presume that's not the real address, which is fine).
    >>
    >> Any chance you can do "ip addr" (or the equivalent) for this
    interface?
    >> I'd like to check if the address assigned is really the same as
    what
    >> you're giving in the "-B" parameter to iperf3. Also you can see
    the MTU
    >> for the link (might help with the ping issue you mentioned).
    >>
    >> While the test is running you might be able to (from another
    window) use
    >> "netstat -an" as additional verification of the local address
    being used.
    >>
    >> Bruce.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Iperf-users mailing list
    >> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users>
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Iperf-users mailing list
    > Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users>
    >



    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
    engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
    _______________________________________________
    Iperf-users mailing list
    Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
    <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to