On 14/10/2009, at 21:04, brente wrote: > Well said, Sean. And bravo for all staying mellow and cool despite > technical differences. One thing I like about this list is that > people are nice and very helpful. > > Jorge, maybe you could write an extension js that adds the > functionality you need for full browsers, without adding it to the > main jqtouch.js file?
It ought to be built in(to) iui/jqtouch/iWebkit/others (but not as an extension, imo) > I totally hear what you're saying with wanting a framework that works > well, gracefully degrades and scales appropriately. And if the > browser companies could decide on real standards to adhere to, we'd > all be in a different position. The mobile landscape with browsers > sure is annoying. It's pretty easy nowadays to make (it) work in these 4: Safari, Chrome FF and Opera. IE is "different", you know. > And having to consider, which I am now, to > architect 3 versions of your site (full browser, webkit smartphone, > and lite-text) brings back 1999 browser compatibility nightmares > again. I hear ya. > > I've used IUI for a real-world site and am learning jQTouch now. They > both rock and have their pros/cons. I too seek the day when there is > "one code base to rule them all". Let me know if you find it. I've got it.: my hyper-forked iui :-) Whenever I touch it I make sure it runs too in the other 3 browsers. -- Jorge. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iPhoneWebDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
