HP DL 140 with Aelita Software BMC firmware, IPMI 1.5. 
Hmmm, I've never seen one of those.

I noticed in an earlier email that you are trying to set up the 2nd NIC
for IPMI LAN.
Have you tried the 1st NIC also?

Also, some BMCs (I don't know about this one), need to share the IP and
MAC with the OS NIC, while others may use a separate MAC & IP, even
though it is from the same connector.
You should try both methods, unless someone from HP can chime in to give
more info about this BMC.  

Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Federico Tomassini
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 6:46 AM
To: Fred Skrotzki
Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] lan problems on hp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fred Skrotzki wrote:
> You've not said who's hardware you are using so it is hard to
determine
> if you are doing something right or wrong as some have quirks that
> others do not.
> 
> The OS settings and ethernet interface used on the machine have
nothing
> to do with the BMC's settings (and should not if you think about it).
> It should be a totally separate system so that you can place it in out
> of band if needed.  In the lan print 2 statement you provided you can
> see that the default gateway IP is not on the same subnet, it needs to
> be.  Depending on implementation it is possible it considers this a
huge
> error and will not configure the port properly until it if fixed.  We
> have several systems here where if it is not defined right it just
does
> not work.
> 
> Also in most systems (not all but 90% ish) you can not use the
machine's
> network interface to get to the same machines BMC external IP if they
> use the same physical port.  If they are using different ports then
yes.
> Dell for example uses the first eth port for both the BMC and OS level
> eth. They are stacked on each other and there is not a small buildin
> switch connecting them.  So the OS Nic's transmit pair is directly
> connected to the BMC's Transmit pair and wired out so one can't hear
the
> other.  You can't go out that interface to come back in, it just does
> not work.

Excuse me Fred, I don't want to be boring, but I'm going to be crazy :/

After a lot of trials, without luck, I try to explain the situation, so
that it will be possible, and I hope easy, to give some advice.

The machine where I have a BMC controller has two NICs:

 eth0:
   ip  -> A.B.C.D
   MAC -> 00:15:60:ED:DA:CE

 eth1:
   ip  -> 10.0.2.245
   MAC -> 00:15:60:ED:DA:CF

the eth1 iface is the NIC that I want to connect to, but I tried to use
also the eth0 iface.

When I run bmclanconf, the MAC address is always setted to
00:15:60:ed:dd:62.

Now, I tried each possible configuration (on eth0 and eth1).

 * I tried to set the lan channel with the same ip of my NICs.

 * I tried to set the lan channel with a third ip. In this case, I tried
   also to force the arp table of the client, where I try to run
   `ipmitool -I lan...`:

     arp -s 10.0.2.13 00:15:60:ed:dd:62 -i eth1

   or, when using eth0:

     arp -s A.B.C.E 00:15:60:ed:dd:62 -i eth0

Multiple gateway addresses has been tested with each configuration.

The result is always the same: connection is not established.
Both ipmitool and ipmiping are failing.

The machine is a HP DL 140, and `dmesg` shows:

[    0.420783] IPMI System Interface driver.
[    0.420839] ipmi_si: Trying SMBIOS-specified KCS state machine at
memory address 0xca2, slave address 0x20, irq 0
[    0.420909]  Could not set up I/O space
[    0.864879] ipmi: Found new BMC (man_id: 0x000f85,  prod_id: 0x0000,
dev_id: 0x00)
[    0.864983]  IPMI KCS interface initialized
[    0.865034] ipmi_si: Found default KCS state machine at I/O address
0xca2
[    0.865089] Copyright (C) 2004 MontaVista Software - IPMI Powerdown
via sys_reboot.
[    0.886055] IPMI poweroff: Found a chassis style poweroff function


I'm thinking to buy some hardware switch, with a web interface to
control my remote machine, but I'm wondering if, failing ipmitool, also
the hardware switch will fail.

For now, thanks a lot for your helps

br

- --
efphe




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHU+yQi7obm7aBjHcRAkCHAJ0Rde7SC9HUM8BEgoJcy123ia8UkACfalz3
crpLLb0GIWN50HBgZtWRvbc=
=o1X7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel

Reply via email to