On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Zdenek Styblik
<zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:07 PM,  <dick.detwei...@emerson.com> wrote:
>> OK - will let you know what we find.
>>
>> Thanks Z,
>>
>> Richard Detweiler |  T 256-261-6550
>>
>
> Hello Richard,
>
> any progress on this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Z.
>

Scratch that.

Z.

>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zdenek Styblik [mailto:zdenek.styb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:07 AM
>> To: Detweiler, Dick [NETPWR/AVOCENT/AL]
>> Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [ ipmitool-Bugs-3571570 ] delloem exec file won't handle more 
>> than one command
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:35 PM,  <dick.detwei...@emerson.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello Dick,
>>>
>>>> Styblik indicates via a comment yesterday that the patches I submitted 
>>>> last September for this issue will not be added to ipmitool saying " I'm 
>>>> afraid fix will be, well, complicated."
>>>>
>>>
>>> yep, that's what I said. However, I didn't say issue won't be fixed.
>>>
>>>> I believe the patches I sent were a complete fix. We have been using them 
>>>> since September without issue.
>>>
>>> Despite your patch does fix issue in question, there is no need to
>>> "fix", or modify in any other way, 'src/ipmishell.c', because it isn't
>>> broken. But 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' apparently is.
>>>
>>>> We would much rather use ipmitool without patches rather than keep patches 
>>>> around that fix generic issues like this.
>>>
>>> If other modules were affected, that would be a generic issue. But it
>>> seems to me they're not. So I would say it's a 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c'
>>> issue.
>>>
>>>> What else is required to get these changes into ipmitool?
>>>
>>> Re-write 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' a bit, resp. change the way it handles 
>>> argc/argv.
>>>
>>
>> You know what? If you have time and willing to try something out, try to 
>> change following in 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c':
>> ~~~
>> -static int current_arg = 0;
>> +int current_arg = 0;
>> ~~~
>>
>> And see whether it doesn't break normal operation of 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' 
>> and whether it fixes your/reported issue as well.
>> That's the quickest/easiest fix that comes, resp. I had for some time, in my 
>> mind. I obviously haven't tried it, but I would (eventually).
>>
>> Z.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Z.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dick Detweiler
>>>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel

Reply via email to