On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:07 PM, <dick.detwei...@emerson.com> wrote: >> OK - will let you know what we find. >> >> Thanks Z, >> >> Richard Detweiler | T 256-261-6550 >> > > Hello Richard, > > any progress on this one? > > Thanks, > Z. >
Scratch that. Z. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Zdenek Styblik [mailto:zdenek.styb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:07 AM >> To: Detweiler, Dick [NETPWR/AVOCENT/AL] >> Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [ ipmitool-Bugs-3571570 ] delloem exec file won't handle more >> than one command >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:35 PM, <dick.detwei...@emerson.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>> >>> Hello Dick, >>> >>>> Styblik indicates via a comment yesterday that the patches I submitted >>>> last September for this issue will not be added to ipmitool saying " I'm >>>> afraid fix will be, well, complicated." >>>> >>> >>> yep, that's what I said. However, I didn't say issue won't be fixed. >>> >>>> I believe the patches I sent were a complete fix. We have been using them >>>> since September without issue. >>> >>> Despite your patch does fix issue in question, there is no need to >>> "fix", or modify in any other way, 'src/ipmishell.c', because it isn't >>> broken. But 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' apparently is. >>> >>>> We would much rather use ipmitool without patches rather than keep patches >>>> around that fix generic issues like this. >>> >>> If other modules were affected, that would be a generic issue. But it >>> seems to me they're not. So I would say it's a 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' >>> issue. >>> >>>> What else is required to get these changes into ipmitool? >>> >>> Re-write 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' a bit, resp. change the way it handles >>> argc/argv. >>> >> >> You know what? If you have time and willing to try something out, try to >> change following in 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c': >> ~~~ >> -static int current_arg = 0; >> +int current_arg = 0; >> ~~~ >> >> And see whether it doesn't break normal operation of 'lib/ipmi_delloem.c' >> and whether it fixes your/reported issue as well. >> That's the quickest/easiest fix that comes, resp. I had for some time, in my >> mind. I obviously haven't tried it, but I would (eventually). >> >> Z. >> >>> Best regards, >>> Z. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dick Detweiler >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel