On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Dan Gora <d...@adax.com> wrote: > As for me, I'd like to try and get the changes to be able to remove > the -Wno-unused-return flag from the Makefile since that breaks > builds. There are several patches pending to be merged for that (ID > 65: Fixes for configure.in for cross compilation). >
Stupid me. I forgot about these. However, we're talking about RC not release. > I also have two patches for ipmi_picmg.c that I'd like to try and get > in if possible. One is to change atoi to use the str2* Huh? Where? I see no atoi() in ipmi_picmg.c. However, I see one atoi() in ipmi_hpmfwupg.c which has slipped through. How's that even possible, garrr! > and a small > one to fix up the help message for 'ipmitool picmg policy set'. I > haven't submitted those yet, but I was going to today. Is it really crucial to get it into 1.8.13? > > Also Dmitry has some good looking changes for ipmi_hpmfwupg.c that he > submitted yesterday, but I don't think that they apply cleanly to the > CVS root. I don't know if he has any plans to try and fix those up or > not, but it would probably be nice to have. > Again, same question. We have 1.8.12 for a year now; we know 1.8.13 is going to be released for some time now, yet out of the blue new fixes, very important no doubt, start rolling as the date comes closer. I know I'm being sarcastic, I know I'm raining on the parade, I'm sorry(not really), but somebody has to do it. We could go on like this until the very last day. So let's say no. Let's say leave it for 1.8.14 which could be released anytime, say, 3+ months after 1.8.13, depending on man power and pressure. I think there is enough of bugs that go unfixed already and are going to slip into another release. > Do we have any kind of hard time limits to get a release out? I too > would like to get a release sooner than later, but the more fixes we > can get into this release, the better IMO... No, but somebody has to review all of that. And if I knew how to express next degree of being tight of time, I'd. Me, personally, I'll be glad to fininish #65 mentioned above, DCMI, SEL and at most couple reviews aside. As I said, there was plenty of time and it's kind of proven this ``one more feature'' thing can go on forever. Z. > > thanks > dan > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jim Mankovich <jm...@hp.com> wrote: >>> All, >>> I would like to start the 1.8.13 release process this week. Are there >>> any pending changes that you feel I should wait for before creating the >>> first release candidate tar bundle? >>> >>> Thanks in Advance, >>> Jim >>> >>> -- >>> --- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com (US Mountain Time) --- >>> >> >> Jim, >> >> I have two things to fix before 1.8.13 is released, but I don't feel >> like creation of RC should be put on hold because of these. >> One is pretty much just a commit, the other one is, I have to admit, >> more complicated than that, >> >> Regards, >> Z. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
