On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] >> If you want to go though all this hassle of getting rid of every scanf >> from the code, then that's up to you, but I don't think that there is >> any reason to intermingle this fairly massive project with my fairly >> simple patch to add return code checking. They are two different >> things and should be done in two different patches. >> > > Very, very sad, but you're right. I did quick grep through sources and > then did double-facepalm. I guess enough said. > I'll give it a commit once I recover. > > Z.
Dan, it's in. Removal of '-Wno-unused-result' remains and I hate (new) SF.net very much. Regards, Z. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
