On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Jim Bound wrote:
> Exactly. J. Yu's draft works now by administration just like IPv4. No
> better, no worse. Anything else is not even proposed std and no product
> vendor code bases I am aware of or more directly router vendor v6 code
> bases are implementing any IPng disucssion which did not result in any
> consensus for IPv6 Working Group.
Jim,
this is probably because english is my second language, but the above
paragraph made no sense whatsoever to me.
/vijay
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
