Vijay,
>> Exactly. J. Yu's draft works now by administration just like IPv4. No
>> better, no worse. Anything else is not even proposed std and no product
>> vendor code bases I am aware of or more directly router vendor v6 code
>> bases are implementing any IPng disucssion which did not result in any
>> consensus for IPv6 Working Group.
>Jim,
>
>this is probably because english is my second language, but the above
>paragraph made no sense whatsoever to me.
Well the best I can do. Then I suggest you take Bob Hinden's mail to
heart. We will have multiple solutions for now.
regards,
/jim
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
