I provided no context beyond the reference to the previous thread
as I did not see any need to rehash that thread and waste
everyones time. I have previously stated quite clearly the
numerous deficiencies in J. Yu's draft and encourage you to read
the original thread on the subject. I will be happy to forward
the entire thread to you if you missed it.
Ben
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 01:30:18PM -0400, Jim Bound wrote:
> Ben,
>
> >Please direct your attention to the lengthy discussion of the
> >numerous flaws in this draft on the ipng list starting
> >on September 14, 1999. I do not believe this draft provides
> >any benefit ro network operators. The draft on multihoming by
> >itojun is a far superior work (as disscussed last September).
>
> I disagree with you and J. Yu's draft does provide benefit to network
> operators. I also believe Itojun's does too. All I will say which is
> about as much context you gave me in your mail. But thats my opinion.
>
> /jim
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
